(11-12-2010, 02:00 PM)chrisveley Wrote: I already submitted my lineups with this trade in it... I see no reason why it should be veto'd because Brantley isn't exactly chump change.... one of the best lead off guys in the league.
I would suggest submitting a new lineup until this is resolved.
Quote:It's not a bad trade, it just may not make sense from LAA's side. Maybe LAA is flipping Brantley for a pitcher... it's nobodies spot to veto the trade because they don't agree with LAA's stratagy but agree its a fair trade.
No one here has claimed "bad trade". LAA reasoning has been called into question several times now and he seems to be struggling to deal towards a specific outcome. As a new GM, he's going to have to explain his reasoning in a manner that gives us confidence he's not going to be a short stay with LA that ruins the franchise. As a veteran GM, you're gonig to have to accept the risk of a vetoed trade if the guy you're trading with can't establish his intentions.
