First Class Mogul
CLE/LAA - Printable Version

+- First Class Mogul (https://www.firstclassmogul.com)
+-- Forum: General Manager's Office (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=26)
+--- Forum: Trade Central (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=32)
+---- Forum: Trades Vetoed (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=36)
+---- Thread: CLE/LAA (/showthread.php?tid=2775)

Pages: 1 2


CLE/LAA - chrisveley - 11-10-2010

Cleveland Gets:
Benoit Schexnayder OF (80/85)
Joe Taylor SP (78/92)
Franz Trosclair RP (67/86)
Luis Heredia SP (78/86)

LA Gets:
Michael Brantley CF (88/90)
$12M

More prospects and lose some salary.


RE: CLE/LAA - raysman1 - 11-10-2010

Accept, I get a one year rental, and get the cash I need. The only way I could get the cash was if I traded Taylor, since my rotation is strong :/ But I'll get spects in the draft.

I'll also lower my farm expenses to pay for my team salaries.


RE: CLE/LAA - Jordan - 11-10-2010

Idk - if my trade got vetoed why should this be approved. Very similar except a little more inflated here.


RE: CLE/LAA - chrisveley - 11-10-2010

Shush you. It's fair


RE: CLE/LAA - raysman1 - 11-10-2010

Jordan, how is this trade similar to the trade we tried to get through? I'm getting an elite player with cash, not just cash.

If you break it down, I'm trading Trosclair, and Taylor for Brantley, and then Heredia and Schexnayder for 12mil, plus I can resign Brantley without an agent.

Brantley is a great player, and this trade is pretty fair, this is nowhere close to the LAA/Pitt deal.


RE: CLE/LAA - Jordan - 11-10-2010

It's basicly the same trade except CLE thru in a guy and u thru in more prospects.


RE: CLE/LAA - raysman1 - 11-10-2010

(11-10-2010, 10:47 PM)Jordan Wrote: It's basicly the same trade except CLE thru in a guy and u thru in more prospects.

How is Cleveland throwing in a guy?

It's Micheal Brantley, the guy with 95 contact, 87 speed, 93 eye, 93 fielding....that doesn't sound like a throw in to me.


RE: CLE/LAA - AndyP - 11-11-2010

I don't understand why LA is trading for a rental....


RE: CLE/LAA - chrisveley - 11-11-2010

(11-11-2010, 12:20 AM)AndyP Wrote: I don't understand why LA is trading for a rental....

He resigns for around the same he's at now.


RE: CLE/LAA - AndyP - 11-11-2010

He claimed it was a rental.