In addition to rocky's suggestion

[mike]

I fail to see how the risk is changed. If all guys are getting 2 year deals anyway THERE IS NO ADDED RISK. It's the same result. Changing it to 2 years simply does nothing. Now if you wanna move it to 3 or 4 you might have an argument. The evidence is right in front of you. If everyone gets a 2 year deal anyway then why would it somehow be more risky to let a guy go knowing he now has to get a 2 year deal?