• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Compensation
#21
my vote would be to leave it as is. we get a good crop of fa every year, lets try and keep it that way. the only way i'd be down for some kind of change is if the current system is too much workload for you.
#22
I'm fine with the current system, don't really see any issues.
Pit
2104-2106

237-249 record






Det
2047-2103

5,268-3,807 record

43 Playoff Appearances
27 Division Titles
19 Pennants
6 World Championships  

Houston Astros
2035-2046

1133-811 record

9 Playoff Appearances
5 Division Titles
1 Pennant


#23
Keep things as they are, I think it works fine.
COL GM: 2043 - present

2063 World Champions
2061 NL Champions
#24
Keep it as it is. Don't fix things that are not broken.
Lad

Dodgers 2036 - Present
Padres 2026-2035
23 NL West Championships
9 Wild Cards
National League Champion 2057, 2060, 2095, 2115
WORLD SERIES CHAMPION 2057
#25
I would just inflate Type A and B fallback prices.

Type A 2y/20m

Type B 2y/10m

[Image: MIL-CHAMPS.jpg]
MIL GM: 2060 - 2093 , 2104 - 2106
PIT GM: 2094 - 2103
BAL GM: 2107 - present

5x World Series Championships (2077, 2088, 2090, 2104, 2105)



 





#26
The only issue I considered maybe doing was only allowing players to be comped once. It makes sense, but I don't see it as a major issue either.
World Champion 2018, 2021, 2026, 2030, 2035, 2037, 2039
AL Champion 12 times
FCM Best Record-Holder - 121-41 2028
Overall Record: 3530-1978 .641%
#27
Keep the same system, but i like the salary suggestion. Bump up compensation to $10M/ 2 years and $20M/ 2 years. Adding another condition to make it so a player can only be comp'd once would be hard for Andy & teams to keep track of.
Los Angeles Dodgers GM
#28
(02-01-2018, 09:40 PM)hickoxb2 Wrote: Keep the same system, but i like the salary suggestion. Bump up compensation to $10M/ 2 years and $20M/ 2 years. Adding another condition to make it so a player can only be comp'd once would be hard for Andy & teams to keep track of.

Same thoughts, here. As for keeping track of guys who have been comp'd, I think just a character in the nickname area like we do for WB would work fine. But I'm fine with keeping the status quo, or making these tweaks.
Houston GM
2060 - present

Playoffs: 20 (Division '68 - '73, '78, '81 -'86, '88, '05-'10)
ALDS Wins: 11 ('68, '70 - '73, '83, '94, '06 - '09)
ALCS Wins: 6 ('71, '73, '83, '06, '08, '09)
2073 WS Champs
#29
What I'm looking for is a noticeable desire among us to make changes. As a general rule....I vote simpler is better and to add rules only when necessary.

So I don't want to act on anything if all we have is a handful of guys say "Yeah...I guess that would be fine. Or whatever"
World Champion 2018, 2021, 2026, 2030, 2035, 2037, 2039
AL Champion 12 times
FCM Best Record-Holder - 121-41 2028
Overall Record: 3530-1978 .641%
#30
Don’t change anything is it a perfect system, no nothing ever is. But it works no need to change anything
Pit GM
'08- Current: Pirates GM Record
'56-'08: Seattle GM Record 4606-3510 .568 win%
'20-'32: San Francisco GM Record 875-1231 .415 win%
'10-'14: Minnesota GM Record 324-324 .500 win%
World Series Champion 2010, 2089, 2092, 2095
American League Champion 2010, 2062, 2089, 2092, 2093, 2095

Best Record Full Year (Regular Season and Playoffs Combined):  131-45 .744 win%
Winner of first ever FCM World Series
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)



Forum Jump: