• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
MIL/KCR
#1
:mil2: Trades:
1B: Shane McGee (89) = 28 - 11.000.000 - Free Agent - 2061

:kcr2: Trades:
C: Alex Stark (89) = 25 - 500k - Arbitration - 2057
SP: Humberto Aracil (88) = 24 - 500k - Arbitration - 2058

I accept this trade. I unload some payroll while getting a couple nice young pieces. Its tough dealing McGee but it was worth doing.
FCM Member since 2040:

Boston:
2044 Season: 75/87 (.463) = 3rd Place
2043 Season: 91-71 (.562) = 3rd Place
2042 Season: 93-69 (.574) = 3rd Place
2041 Season: 68-94 (.420) = 5th Place
2040 Season: 66-96 (.407) = 4th Place

Milwaukee:
#2
Hatch is playing well at 1B but with his drop not sure how long that lasts. McGee is a good upgrade for me especially when I deal from spots of strength.
#3
KCR has agreed to send me the 20% needed to buyout McGees NTC
FCM Member since 2040:

Boston:
2044 Season: 75/87 (.463) = 3rd Place
2043 Season: 91-71 (.562) = 3rd Place
2042 Season: 93-69 (.574) = 3rd Place
2041 Season: 68-94 (.420) = 5th Place
2040 Season: 66-96 (.407) = 4th Place

Milwaukee:
#4
As per the rules I believe mcgee waives his ntc since ive made the playoffs the last 2 years and have a winning record. Or i can send ryan the cash for the 20% so its permanently gone which then he'd immediately use to pay the ntc. Unless you think that goes against the spirit of the rule. Whichever way can be used for it to waived I'm good with.
#5
McGee doesn't qualify for any of the exceptions. We're not at least at July 1 and he has more than 2 years remaining. As far as I'm concerned, KCR adding money in at this point is circumventing the rule.
Cle

Cleveland Record5631-4946 (.532) [2054-2071, 2083-2104, 2110-2135]
AL Post: 16 (ALC), 11 (WC) - ALDS Win: 12 - ALCS Champ: 7 - WS Champ: 4

ALW: Mariners + Angels Record: 1072-864 (.554) [2042-2048, 2105-2110]
AL Post: 3 (ALW), 4 (WC) - ALDS Win: 3 - ALCS Champ: 1 - WS Champ: 1

NLW: Rockies + Padres Record: 3230-2753 (.540) [2017-2042, 2072-2082]
NL Post: 18 (NLW), 4 (WC) - NLDS Win: 7 - NLCS Champ: 4 - WS Champ: 0
#6
I feel it isn't circumventing the rule really because in a similar situation we allowed cash to be used in the deal otherwise colorado wouldn't of had enough cash to make the deal.

http://www.firstclassmogul.com/showthread.php?tid=32981

Yes, it wasn't the whole thing but I still feel it falls under the same category. Especially given Ryan's financial state as he's predicted to almost double the loss of what he can afford.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Forum Jump: