sxr007
Offline
Posts: 3,004
Threads: 771
Joined: Jan 2012
I agree Matty's idea has a big loophole and also is not a simple solution. Seems like a real easy way to screw over new owners who don't know the rules as well.
I think Mike's idea has some merit. I think arb. players are within a decent range. It is free agents I think we get away with signing to cheap.
Dodgers 2036 - Present
Padres 2026-2035
23 NL West Championships
9 Wild Cards
National League Champion 2057, 2060, 2095, 2115
WORLD SERIES CHAMPION 2057
mattynokes
Offline
Cleveland Guardians GM
Posts: 8,967
Threads: 4,303
Joined: Feb 2011
07-01-2016, 06:48 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-01-2016, 06:52 PM by mattynokes.)
1. If the player is in FA, then anyone could bid on him.
2. The "loophole" is intended as way for teams to retain their players without any contest.
3. I'd be a fan of limiting what you can do in re-signings since you can manipulate the game and, honestly, what player is going to sit there through 8 different rebuttals? Though I feel teams should be able to get the years they want as Mogul is notoriously bad at determining the years to ask for. Two Clicks would be good. Make your offer, hear their rebuttal, and then come to an agreement.
Arbitration is fine as it is. The process isn't well enough executed in Mogul to have to accept whatever the player wants. Every player goes through an arbitration hearing in Mogul when the vast majority of them will meet in the middle in real life and never see an arbitration hearing. However, when they do go to arbitration, you aren't normally having as big of a gap as we see in Mogul. The player that asks for $10M and you get for $5M in Mogul is likely to ask for $5.5-6M in the real world.
4. I'm fine with having this idea bazooka'd and focusing on how players are signed and another idea that was brought up today - raising the revenue sharing to further lessen the budget gaps.
Cleveland Record: 5631-4946 (.532) [2054-2071, 2083-2104, 2110-2135]
AL Post: 16 (ALC), 11 (WC) - ALDS Win: 12 - ALCS Champ: 7 - WS Champ: 4
ALW: Mariners + Angels Record: 1072-864 (.554) [2042-2048, 2105-2110]
AL Post: 3 (ALW), 4 (WC) - ALDS Win: 3 - ALCS Champ: 1 - WS Champ: 1
NLW: Rockies + Padres Record: 3230-2753 (.540) [2017-2042, 2072-2082]
NL Post: 18 (NLW), 4 (WC) - NLDS Win: 7 - NLCS Champ: 4 - WS Champ: 0
Geaux Blue
Offline
Jack the Reacher
Posts: 3,249
Threads: 1,269
Joined: Jan 2013
Not being a mogul genius I have a question of equalizing cities.
Does that mean it will give less incentive to be good for a long period time to which your budget increases and doesn't hurt as much to be bad for a long period time so your budget won't drop as much as it would normally?
It should hurt a teams bottom line if they are poor for an extended period of time just as it should boost a teams cash flow if they are competitive for years on end.
This may all be a moot point and equalizing cities may not have an effect like the ones i'm talking about, i'm just curious.
2104-2106
237-249 record
2047-2103
5,268-3,807 record
43 Playoff Appearances
27 Division Titles
19 Pennants
6 World Championships
Houston Astros
2035-2046
1133-811 record
9 Playoff Appearances
5 Division Titles
1 Pennant
Atlbravesfan27
Offline
Trade Mod / Braves GM
Posts: 3,646
Threads: 900
Joined: Sep 2010
I'm with a few others on this. Less is more. I like the effort and thoughtfulness put into this, but I'm just not a fan. At some point, rules get to be too much for a hobby...
sxr007
Offline
Posts: 3,004
Threads: 771
Joined: Jan 2012
(07-01-2016, 07:26 PM)Atlbravesfan27 Wrote: I'm with a few others on this. Less is more. I like the effort and thoughtfulness put into this, but I'm just not a fan. At some point, rules get to be too much for a hobby...
I agree adding lots of rules can be to much. If it is a simple fix of not negotiating contracts in free agency then fine. Otherwise dont make rules for things that aren't really broke.
Dodgers 2036 - Present
Padres 2026-2035
23 NL West Championships
9 Wild Cards
National League Champion 2057, 2060, 2095, 2115
WORLD SERIES CHAMPION 2057
AndyP
Offline
Commissioner/7 time Champion
Posts: 15,110
Threads: 3,816
Joined: Jul 2010
I think it's worth pointing out....nothing is really broken. Our finances as a league are as stable as they've ever been. FA crops are not always going to be awesome, they ebb and flow just like the real ones do. FA is a beast that I just don't think can be tackled easily and I definitely don't think a network of offer sheets is the way to do it. A bunch of rules about clicks and negotiations is obnoxious to me as well.
And let's also be clear - if we did tweak revenue sharing so there is more balance among the franchises (something I'm ok with), that will likely have an adverse effect on FA since lower revenue teams would then have less issue resigning their players.
World Champion 2018, 2021, 2026, 2030, 2035, 2037, 2039
AL Champion 12 times
FCM Best Record-Holder - 121-41 2028
Overall Record: 3530-1978 .641%
Chuck
Offline
Boston Red Sox GM
Posts: 475
Threads: 193
Joined: Aug 2010
Quote:if i wait until september through the playoffs sim, i run the risk of another team bidding that fallback thing you mentioned if i try to resign a player and i'd have to pay more to keep the player. but, why wouldn't a team just sign the player anywhere from July 1st-August 16th sim
I'm new to the league and haven't gone through an off-season yet but I agree with this. I'd think that by Aug. 16 I'd know who I want to keep and would go ahead and re-sign those players at that point.
I also agree that over-complicating this process isn't the way to go. I do this as a hobby. I have a family and have a more than full-time job. Depending on the time of year (especially when my real teams' seasons are going on) I barely have time to pay attention at all, much less start figuring 1.25x fallback salaries and comp possibilities.
All-in on making the league a better league and like that people are discussing ways to do that!
hokeyrules
Offline
Admin / Former Marlins HOF GM / Former Rangers GM/ Current Jays GM
Posts: 5,462
Threads: 1,062
Joined: Jul 2010
I would rather keep things the same and not continually change rules every few years, this is coming from someone who has not been the most active over the last two months and really for personal reasons do not want to have to spend a closer eye on my team without getting fucked over until things get less busy.
Florida GM: 2010 - 2032
Texas GM: 2033 - 2040
Florida GM: 2041 - 2103
Toronto GM: 2104 - ?
World Champion: Florida: 2015, 2027, 2053, 2059, 2062, 2064 Texas: 2037
NL Champion: 2014, 2015, 2020, 2027, 2030, 2037 2048, 2050, 2053, 2059, 2062, 2064
Best Season Record: 117-45 (2060)
2011 - 2032: 2263 - 1359 .625%
2033 - 2040: 617 - 679 .476%
2041 - 2103: 5156 - 4888 .513%
2104 - ? 0-0 0%
Total Record: 8036 - 6926 .537%
Best Pitcher Ever: Donovan Pace
mzylinski
Offline
Seattle Mariners GM/President of Operations
Posts: 4,042
Threads: 1,214
Joined: Jul 2010
I understand the purpose of this but feel it is unnecessary lets leave things be.
GM
'08- Current: Pirates GM Record
'56-'08: Seattle GM Record 4606-3510 .568 win%
'20-'32: San Francisco GM Record 875-1231 .415 win%
'10-'14: Minnesota GM Record 324-324 .500 win%
World Series Champion 2010, 2089, 2092, 2095
American League Champion 2010, 2062, 2089, 2092, 2093, 2095
Best Record Full Year (Regular Season and Playoffs Combined): 131-45 .744 win%
Winner of first ever FCM World Series
|