+- First Class Mogul (https://www.firstclassmogul.com)
+-- Forum: General Manager's Office (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=26)
+--- Forum: Trade Central (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=32)
+---- Forum: Trades Vetoed (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=36)
+---- Thread: SFG/LAA (/showthread.php?tid=2099)
Pages:
1
2
SFG/LAA - Scott - 10-10-2010
:SFG: sends:
Tommy Joseph C 82/98 min. 2017
James Rock CF 68/83 min. 2017
:LAA: sends:
Aoi Kami SP 93 9.5M 2018
How the fuck do you pronounce his name? Who cares. He's good. Accept
RE: SFG/LAA - MethodMan - 10-10-2010
I accept I kinda wish i got an ok SP out of it but i still got some good players
RE: SFG/LAA - AndyP - 10-10-2010
(10-10-2010, 11:45 PM)MethodMan Wrote: I accept I kinda wish i got an ok SP out of it but i still got some good players
Why are you trading one of your best players while you're leading your division?
RE: SFG/LAA - MethodMan - 10-10-2010
i need to cut SAL and hes getting old plus i need a C
RE: SFG/LAA - AndyP - 10-10-2010
The catcher you got in return isn't better than your current one and Kami is one of your most reasonably signed guys.
this trade makes no sense to me.
RE: SFG/LAA - MethodMan - 10-11-2010
well you never put ur vote in
RE: SFG/LAA - AndyP - 10-11-2010
Veto...on the basis of pooor reasoning by a new GM.
RE: SFG/LAA - dejota - 10-11-2010
I also veto there are better and more efficient ways to address a catcher need than shipping your most reasonably priced and arguably best starter.
RE: SFG/LAA - MethodMan - 10-11-2010
(10-11-2010, 01:00 PM)dejota Wrote: I also veto there are better and more efficient ways to address a catcher need than shipping your most reasonably priced and arguably best starter.
I have stras as my best started
RE: SFG/LAA - terrythek - 10-12-2010
DJ said arguably and you haven't addressed what any of the other mods have said, you were even saying how you would have wanted to get a SP back in the deal so you are making arguments against us approving it. You need to address why this deal is what you want/need and I haven't heard that yet, so veto unless the angels have a better argument