Poll: What should we do?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Stay as is - 31%
16.67%
3 16.67%
Bump up to 41%
16.67%
3 16.67%
Bump up to 50%
66.67%
12 66.67%
Something else - say in thread
0%
0 0%
Total 18 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Rev Sharing
#2
I like the 50% sharing. I know the example that was discussed was Boston and Tampa where the change to 50% basically meant Boston loses the money that can sign one top tier player while Tampa gains the money that can sign one mid-tier player. Essentially it's -1 Type A player for BOS and +1 Type B player for TBR. The swing for a team like Tampa that will never have a budget like Boston is great. It's good for balancing the inequalities that are nothing more than you have this city, while he has that city.
Cle

Cleveland Record5631-4946 (.532) [2054-2071, 2083-2104, 2110-2135]
AL Post: 16 (ALC), 11 (WC) - ALDS Win: 12 - ALCS Champ: 7 - WS Champ: 4

ALW: Mariners + Angels Record: 1072-864 (.554) [2042-2048, 2105-2110]
AL Post: 3 (ALW), 4 (WC) - ALDS Win: 3 - ALCS Champ: 1 - WS Champ: 1

NLW: Rockies + Padres Record: 3230-2753 (.540) [2017-2042, 2072-2082]
NL Post: 18 (NLW), 4 (WC) - NLDS Win: 7 - NLCS Champ: 4 - WS Champ: 0
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Messages In This Thread
Rev Sharing - by AndyP - 07-20-2016, 12:32 AM
RE: Rev Sharing - by mattynokes - 07-20-2016, 12:57 AM
RE: Rev Sharing - by 'PR' - 07-20-2016, 09:31 AM
RE: Rev Sharing - by gmoney - 07-20-2016, 12:01 PM
RE: Rev Sharing - by AndyP - 07-20-2016, 03:40 PM
RE: Rev Sharing - by AndyP - 07-20-2016, 03:56 PM
RE: Rev Sharing - by AndyP - 07-20-2016, 07:14 PM
RE: Rev Sharing - by cadmus2166 - 07-20-2016, 07:27 PM
RE: Rev Sharing - by Geaux Blue - 07-20-2016, 07:55 PM
RE: Rev Sharing - by warpriest - 07-20-2016, 08:38 PM
RE: Rev Sharing - by mzylinski - 07-21-2016, 08:10 PM
RE: Rev Sharing - by AndyP - 07-21-2016, 08:20 PM

Forum Jump: