A Couple of Suggestions

[AndyP]

as far as the 60 wins, i think it could be a bit unfair if one team is in a division with say 3 90 win teams or something, but yet their team is better overall but has say 58 wins and another team is in a division with the winner of division that only has say 85 wins, but they squeak by with 60 wins and not punished at all. i think it would be fair to do a judgment call and deem that 58 win team looks better than their record shows and not get punished.

I would consider all of these negotiable depending upon the actions of the general manager.

In retrospect, 50M may be a bit harsh, but some sort of penalty even for 60 wins seems like at least a push in the right direction.

I don't want some half-ass 51 win teams either that try to just skate by and then petition themselves away from the hard 50 win penalty. That's what I was trying to avoid.