I hope nobody's getting pissed. I'm certainly not.
And all we can do is remain open to having my mind changed when we veto. And I think every mod is open to solutions but we don't feel like they should be limited to just the teams involved currently since a major reason we're vetoing is they weren't shopped. To be blunt, if you really felt like this is such a fair deal for CIN you would've addressed the deal, not just underlying general principles we've debated in-depth previously.
We've spent a lot of time discussing the modding situation for FCM and how the mods are going to approach it. We've specifically chosen mods for their varying POV on what's passable and what's not passable. We've clearly demonstrated not shopping a player is cause for veto. Sometimes we end up approving the deal or a similar one after some reflection other times it's been permanently vetoed, but the fact it's gone both ways just reiterates the mod's goal of fairness, in general.
I understand how we could come across poorly and I tried to qualify that in my initial response. I apologize for not doing a good enough job and I hope this is a more satisfactory explanation but it's in the best interest of the league to go into a holding pattern for a day or two as opposed to irrevocably approving a deal that leaves CIN w/out their best ML pieces for a rebuild.
And all we can do is remain open to having my mind changed when we veto. And I think every mod is open to solutions but we don't feel like they should be limited to just the teams involved currently since a major reason we're vetoing is they weren't shopped. To be blunt, if you really felt like this is such a fair deal for CIN you would've addressed the deal, not just underlying general principles we've debated in-depth previously.
We've spent a lot of time discussing the modding situation for FCM and how the mods are going to approach it. We've specifically chosen mods for their varying POV on what's passable and what's not passable. We've clearly demonstrated not shopping a player is cause for veto. Sometimes we end up approving the deal or a similar one after some reflection other times it's been permanently vetoed, but the fact it's gone both ways just reiterates the mod's goal of fairness, in general.
I understand how we could come across poorly and I tried to qualify that in my initial response. I apologize for not doing a good enough job and I hope this is a more satisfactory explanation but it's in the best interest of the league to go into a holding pattern for a day or two as opposed to irrevocably approving a deal that leaves CIN w/out their best ML pieces for a rebuild.
Houston Astros - 2012/2016/2023/2025 Champs!
Cumulative Record: 1894 - 1184 (.615%)
Cumulative Record: 1894 - 1184 (.615%)