10-27-2014, 04:08 PM
(10-27-2014, 12:28 PM)AndyP Wrote: I'd like to keep things at 10M for now and see how this change to WB alters how much people are utilizing it. If there is no change then I think we can revisit cost adjustments. Basically, I want 3-4 seasons to see how participation levels look first.
Do people really think we need more revenue sharing? I mean that honestly, right now as one of the smallest budgets I have ample spending room to get my team going. So I guess I'm open to hearing if and why people think it necessary.
As for the slots - same as above. I'd like to see how this peak-only WB works for awhile. Same goes for trading WB selections, with changes this radical to it I think it best to take things slowly with some of the variables.
only reason i brought up the increase in revenue sharing is because g$ mentioned it on the podcast and didn't really get any objections from it. so i thought it was worth at least posting. i knew the market that i chose, so i'm not gonna beg or anything for increasing revenue sharing.
i think it's good to see how the peak-only wb will work first like you said. if it takes out $300+ million cash every year (even past WB's here weren't always taking out 400 million, some years were in the 300 million range) then i think that's good. and if you still feel we have a lil too much excess cash in the file, suggestions 4 and 5 that i proposed could certainly help cut down on the problem even more, or at least be something you could consider.