09-30-2010, 06:29 PM
Of approx 210 FCM trades since we moved to the new site (Late July) we've vetoed 12 (including the recent CIN & NYY vetoes). That's 5% before I even clicked and looking further 3 of the vetoes were just non agreements by other managers, 2 had to be reworked b/c it was posted too close to a sim and ratings changed, another one was a PTBNL deal Baltimore posted, and 2 more are there w/ no vetoes or explanations. In reality we're vetoing 1-2% of the deals.
I don't think it's happening frequently enough to warrant a change. We're not hosing teams when we do veto and whether or not they were "vetoable" is debatable forever. Bottom line is these points are certainly valid, but I feel the current system does serve a useful purpose and given the rate of vetoes I think we're exercising restraint and responsibility when we do veto.
I don't think it's happening frequently enough to warrant a change. We're not hosing teams when we do veto and whether or not they were "vetoable" is debatable forever. Bottom line is these points are certainly valid, but I feel the current system does serve a useful purpose and given the rate of vetoes I think we're exercising restraint and responsibility when we do veto.
Houston Astros - 2012/2016/2023/2025 Champs!
Cumulative Record: 1894 - 1184 (.615%)
Cumulative Record: 1894 - 1184 (.615%)