09-23-2010, 12:48 PM
(09-23-2010, 10:48 AM)dejota Wrote: Well the intention wasn't for it to play out this way. i'm very close to preventing any team who didn't offer arby to get compensation. When will you guys grow up and quit making us have to come up w/ rules?
I mean because of this crap, we have to make a rule which then requires a post which some may or may not see. Which then leads to confusion/anger when GMs play the "I don't know how X works" card all, of which, could've been prevented by you guys using your heads and trying to play ball.
I mean Mstrpr you're one of the teams in question...
I shouldn't have to baby you guys, if you don't understand how something works ASK. I'm always more than happy to help anybody with anything. This playing the loopholes and calling it human nature crap isn't going to keep flying. Capiche?
I agree with this.
(09-23-2010, 12:17 PM)AndyP Wrote: I do agree that the arbitration decision should be done prior to FA. We should ask GMs to post it as part of their offseason resignings. "Release player X, but offering arbitration for the purposes of compensation" type thing.
But also agree with this. I think me and DJ would be fine doing it this way next year