08-07-2012, 05:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-09-2012, 01:01 PM by mattynokes.)
I think one thing you're overlook is the climate/elements. I believe that has a good deal to do with the park factors being what they are. For example, if the wind is usually blowing out at a stadium, it'll have a higher HR factor than an identical park where the wind is usually blowing in from center field.
I believe you would get a +11 HR, +2 BA, -9 2B, -13 3B for a cost of $19M
So your stadium would now be 95 HR, 102 BA, 93 2B, 91 3B
I think the RF wall heights are going to be a big prohibitor to your park becoming high in HR effect.
I believe you would get a +11 HR, +2 BA, -9 2B, -13 3B for a cost of $19M
So your stadium would now be 95 HR, 102 BA, 93 2B, 91 3B
I think the RF wall heights are going to be a big prohibitor to your park becoming high in HR effect.
Cleveland Record: 5631-4946 (.532) [2054-2071, 2083-2104, 2110-2135]
AL Post: 16 (ALC), 11 (WC) - ALDS Win: 12 - ALCS Champ: 7 - WS Champ: 4
ALW: Mariners + Angels Record: 1072-864 (.554) [2042-2048, 2105-2110]
AL Post: 3 (ALW), 4 (WC) - ALDS Win: 3 - ALCS Champ: 1 - WS Champ: 1
NLW: Rockies + Padres Record: 3230-2753 (.540) [2017-2042, 2072-2082]
NL Post: 18 (NLW), 4 (WC) - NLDS Win: 7 - NLCS Champ: 4 - WS Champ: 0