07-21-2012, 02:20 PM
From what I've noticed rating changes are almost entirely defensive changes. The changes reflect more of how a player has performed. For example, I've always felt 3B Kevin Paine has outplayed his defensive ratings. His fielding is about on par, but he's seemed to range better and have a better arm than his ratings suggest. When viewing the file on 2013, he's a much better defender rating-wise. On the flip side, if you see a guy who you don't think is living up to his defensive ratings, he's likely going to look worse on 2013.
I think it could very well help out with recruiting. Fact is a lot of people want to play in leagues on the new software. I would be very confident about being able to get everyone the new version. The hitting charts will add something to the league. The better defensive ratings/position changes will add more realism. Plus what seems like a small thing, being able to set a buyout %, I'm sure is a huge thing to the admins who have to currently have to edit team cash when buying out players.
I think it could very well help out with recruiting. Fact is a lot of people want to play in leagues on the new software. I would be very confident about being able to get everyone the new version. The hitting charts will add something to the league. The better defensive ratings/position changes will add more realism. Plus what seems like a small thing, being able to set a buyout %, I'm sure is a huge thing to the admins who have to currently have to edit team cash when buying out players.
Cleveland Record: 5631-4946 (.532) [2054-2071, 2083-2104, 2110-2135]
AL Post: 16 (ALC), 11 (WC) - ALDS Win: 12 - ALCS Champ: 7 - WS Champ: 4
ALW: Mariners + Angels Record: 1072-864 (.554) [2042-2048, 2105-2110]
AL Post: 3 (ALW), 4 (WC) - ALDS Win: 3 - ALCS Champ: 1 - WS Champ: 1
NLW: Rockies + Padres Record: 3230-2753 (.540) [2017-2042, 2072-2082]
NL Post: 18 (NLW), 4 (WC) - NLDS Win: 7 - NLCS Champ: 4 - WS Champ: 0