Talent Reductions Again! from somebody else's mouth

[AndyP]

The issue is which happens FIRST. If we turn down the farm settings first we will actually see BETTER sustained veterans careers. We can slowly adjust the ratios year by year and phase the change in. Again, we have to look at the horse, not the cart.

I'm suggesting we slow the horse down and then, subsequently, start to drop the talent ratios. You, and DJ in the past, have suggested the exact opposite. Which is, as I point out in the metaphor, baffling. Hell, you might even be able to do them at the same time, but you and DJ historically, keep arguing the matters are separate.

They're not, in fact, what you keep arguing to leave out of the discussion is precisely why we are having the discussion! (Plus the whole bizarre stat distribution argument which is nonsense)

You can't have a wildly unrealistic amount of talent developing after you already have an unrealistic amount of it coming in via the draft and then throw your hands in the air and act shocked that the file has an unrealistic amount of talent.

How in the friggin hell does anyone think that position is logical?