12-16-2011, 07:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-16-2011, 07:50 PM by mattynokes.)
Compensation changes, sure, but Sandwich round, hell no. It's like the Rule V draft. It sounds nice and would be a great addition to the league, but the additional work probably isn't worth it.
I think the arbitration figures for SPs (and possibly RPs) need to different than regular position players. There's 150 starting pitchers while there's just 30 starters at a given defensive position. If we're using the top 7/15 for those with 30 starters at each position, I'd say something like the top 20/40 for SPs would be good (and maybe something like top 10/20 for RPs).
I think the arbitration figures for SPs (and possibly RPs) need to different than regular position players. There's 150 starting pitchers while there's just 30 starters at a given defensive position. If we're using the top 7/15 for those with 30 starters at each position, I'd say something like the top 20/40 for SPs would be good (and maybe something like top 10/20 for RPs).
Cleveland Record: 7313-6184 (.542) [2054-2071, 2083-2104, 2110-2153]
AL Post: 24 (ALC), 18 (WC) - ALDS Win: 17 - ALCS Champ: 9 - WS Champ: 5