08-20-2010, 02:42 PM
(08-19-2010, 01:12 PM)dejota Wrote: I would support awarding key things w/ longevity. A pitcher who makes 96 starts over 3 years probably deserves a health or longevity rating bump but not necessarily an MVP or Cy Young. Or a reliever that tosses 100+IP for three years, etc.
This is more or less what I supported as well. Awards shouldn't determine it, but how then do we set the ground rules to determine who would get a bump?
I love the idea because I HATE that virtually no one 30 and younger in Mogul has realistic Hall of Fame careers due to most guys dying out by the age of 32, so anything to bring some element of actual real life career paths would be great.
The problem is that our guys are still peaking under 24-25 rather then slowly building, so we may completely mess with our talent again doing this.