07-06-2011, 04:13 PM
(07-06-2011, 03:58 PM)dejota Wrote: Mogul/contracts/compensation will never agree. Just use mogul's scout score to see who it thinks is better player, the formula's aren't the same as moguls scout score and contracts take into account a lot of things unrelated to compensation so I don't see what conclusion we can draw from their asking prices.
We don't use FP% in our formula. I've attached a copy of my formula's for review if you'd like to look at them. The most important part is you can see my intent in each formula and which stats I emphasized for the different groups.
Arenedo has a higher BA and OBP over the past two seasons along with better defensive vitals. Only considering his group he's a more valuable player IMO. this is just a difference of opinions I think the fact they score so closely highlights the validity of the formulas since at the end of the day they each have different skills but bring very similar value to the table.
Check out the formulas.
Ah, makes sense now. I'd instead use OPS to replace HR and OBP and I don't think Runs should be used without RBI. Players who rely on doubles (like Arenedo) get no extra value in the compensation formula when clearly it adds value to the player. Runs/RBI are up to the individual as to whether they actually add value or are just a product of opportunity, but I don't think one can be used without the other.
Cleveland Record: 5631-4946 (.532) [2054-2071, 2083-2104, 2110-2135]
AL Post: 16 (ALC), 11 (WC) - ALDS Win: 12 - ALCS Champ: 7 - WS Champ: 4
ALW: Mariners + Angels Record: 1072-864 (.554) [2042-2048, 2105-2110]
AL Post: 3 (ALW), 4 (WC) - ALDS Win: 3 - ALCS Champ: 1 - WS Champ: 1
NLW: Rockies + Padres Record: 3230-2753 (.540) [2017-2042, 2072-2082]
NL Post: 18 (NLW), 4 (WC) - NLDS Win: 7 - NLCS Champ: 4 - WS Champ: 0