• Register
  • Login

  •  
    • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
    Lower Release Payouts - No 100%
    #12
    (05-08-2011, 03:15 AM)mattynokes Wrote: I used to be a big time supporter of the 100% buyout, but the reason I've lessen my stance is because of the random veteran drops. A player randomly dropping off clearly isn't realistic and there's no way to predict who and when it will happen. These random drops can make what was once a smart, logical, and fair contract now look like an irresponsible, dead weight contract.

    This happens in real life as well. Alfonso Soriano anyone? These things are a real life deterrant in some ways and are effective here as well.

    But beyond that, when the 100% was put in, there were three conditions attached to it as well that you could appeal to an admin about to lessen the buyout/ntc.
    Also, if the issue is hurting rebuilds or other franchises based on past GM mistakes or whatever - I don't think anything should be beyond the admins to change. If it's for the good of the league I think most of us will agree to anything, even if it isn't exactly fair.
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Lower Release Payouts - No 100% - by danpac47 - 04-28-2011, 01:06 AM
    RE: Lower Release Payouts - No 100% - by mike - 05-04-2011, 05:16 AM
    RE: Lower Release Payouts - No 100% - by AndyP - 05-07-2011, 08:25 PM
    RE: Lower Release Payouts - No 100% - by danpac47 - 05-04-2011, 04:35 PM
    RE: Lower Release Payouts - No 100% - by mike - 05-07-2011, 08:46 PM
    RE: Lower Release Payouts - No 100% - by AndyP - 05-07-2011, 11:42 PM
    RE: Lower Release Payouts - No 100% - by dejota - 05-08-2011, 02:28 AM
    RE: Lower Release Payouts - No 100% - by mike - 05-08-2011, 03:13 AM
    RE: Lower Release Payouts - No 100% - by AndyP - 05-08-2011, 12:52 PM
    RE: Lower Release Payouts - No 100% - by AndyP - 05-08-2011, 03:16 PM
    RE: Lower Release Payouts - No 100% - by dejota - 05-08-2011, 05:07 PM

    Forum Jump: