04-16-2011, 04:01 PM
Just a suggestion here, but it doesn't really seem fair to me that I'm about to lose my #3 starter on account of him rising from 89 to 91. This after waiting for a reply on McInnis for the past 4 days
Anyways, to try and propose this not happening in the future to other GMs, why not set a cutoff date to where after that date if a player rises above 90 overall you don't have to go through an agent? Say the middle of August. A date where past it, there is no way to have a meaningful negotiation with an agent.
Anyways, to try and propose this not happening in the future to other GMs, why not set a cutoff date to where after that date if a player rises above 90 overall you don't have to go through an agent? Say the middle of August. A date where past it, there is no way to have a meaningful negotiation with an agent.