08-09-2010, 03:22 PM
Nick,
I have to agree with you, the only way it would work if owners were involved that were in it for the long haul. I would probably take it a step further and say that for anyone to be considered for an expansion team, they would need to serve as a co-gm to a team in the league for at least 1 full season. This would help in 2 fold, 1, it would help them familiarize them with the league (rules, players, etc) and 2, it would enable us to qualify the candidate.
Jordan,
Yeah, you got the gist of what I was going at. I would not be totally against expansion if it was done properly. If we get two owners that run another 2 teams in the ground, then we could have some issues.
I have to agree with you, the only way it would work if owners were involved that were in it for the long haul. I would probably take it a step further and say that for anyone to be considered for an expansion team, they would need to serve as a co-gm to a team in the league for at least 1 full season. This would help in 2 fold, 1, it would help them familiarize them with the league (rules, players, etc) and 2, it would enable us to qualify the candidate.
Jordan,
Yeah, you got the gist of what I was going at. I would not be totally against expansion if it was done properly. If we get two owners that run another 2 teams in the ground, then we could have some issues.