What impact would this truly have?
Wouldn't pushing peak start back without adjusting talent levels result in a more docile development environment? Instead of guys like Dyce going from 87/90 to 93/94 from ages 24 through 25 would there be a step inbetween and he wouldn't peak until 26? (for example)
I mean the math guys say the numbers indicate the average peak start of players as 27 years old. At only 10% we've not even bumped that to 26 yet. However if we do this I believe players will develop a lot more slowly and a lot more predictably, but that's just a prediction. I don't actually know. I'm anxious to hear other people's thoughts on this stuff though.
Wouldn't pushing peak start back without adjusting talent levels result in a more docile development environment? Instead of guys like Dyce going from 87/90 to 93/94 from ages 24 through 25 would there be a step inbetween and he wouldn't peak until 26? (for example)
I mean the math guys say the numbers indicate the average peak start of players as 27 years old. At only 10% we've not even bumped that to 26 yet. However if we do this I believe players will develop a lot more slowly and a lot more predictably, but that's just a prediction. I don't actually know. I'm anxious to hear other people's thoughts on this stuff though.
Houston Astros - 2012/2016/2023/2025 Champs!
Cumulative Record: 1894 - 1184 (.615%)
Cumulative Record: 1894 - 1184 (.615%)