05-06-2017, 06:22 PM
(05-06-2017, 06:01 PM)AndyP Wrote:(05-06-2017, 05:05 PM)cadmus2166 Wrote: I voted no to keep MLB realism, unless the option to move is open to other teams as well. I had considered asking about a move to Vegas, but didn't think that was an option. If I'm incorrect in my assumptions, please state so and I'll change my vote.
In general I don't like relocation and in this case I only make it available because there used to be a team there.
As for changing per capita incomes, I consider this a sanity check. 18700 is dumb.
At this point, what other teams are low rev? Pitt or San Diego? I guess I see this as a unique case.
I get the sentimentality with the Expos. I just think we shouldn't go there if relocation is unavailable to the other GMs. Even if it were made available to relocate and re-create past MLB teams that are now defunct, there would be a bias against the west teams, since all the defunct teams are from the east coast or midwest.
COL GM: 2043 - present
2063 World Champions
2061 NL Champions
2063 World Champions
2061 NL Champions