mattynokes
Offline
Cleveland Guardians GM
Posts: 8,981
Threads: 4,308
Joined: Feb 2011
08-22-2019, 11:16 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-22-2019, 12:47 PM by mattynokes.)
We've explored (and now do) allow draft picks to be traded earlier than back in the old days. We now allow Comp picks to be traded, when that wasn't allowed years ago.
I think we're stable enough to make future draft picks available. I'd propose that following Sim #5, next year's Rounds 1-3 are available to be traded. That's it. Nothing more in the future and it preserves the picks needed to surrender for Comp FAs. We already track draft pick trading over the off-season and this would be no different. I think this would help generate some true trade deadline activity instead of the assumed "June 4th" deadline.
*Waiting until after Sim #5 is on purpose. It wouldn't be a big deal to make the picks available directly following the draft. However, I think it helps with not confusing picks as well as helping with rash decisions and quickly gutting next year's picks.*
Cleveland Record: 5631-4946 (.532) [2054-2071, 2083-2104, 2110-2135]
AL Post: 16 (ALC), 11 (WC) - ALDS Win: 12 - ALCS Champ: 7 - WS Champ: 4
ALW: Mariners + Angels Record: 1072-864 (.554) [2042-2048, 2105-2110]
AL Post: 3 (ALW), 4 (WC) - ALDS Win: 3 - ALCS Champ: 1 - WS Champ: 1
NLW: Rockies + Padres Record: 3230-2753 (.540) [2017-2042, 2072-2082]
NL Post: 18 (NLW), 4 (WC) - NLDS Win: 7 - NLCS Champ: 4 - WS Champ: 0
Peter
Offline
GM of the Alexandria Nationals of Washington of the District of Columbia/Gentleman
Posts: 3,651
Threads: 1,641
Joined: Feb 2011
I'm for it
World Champs: 2071, 2106, 2108
cadmus2166
Offline
Posts: 2,491
Threads: 793
Joined: Jan 2013
I think this is a good idea. I also am willing to keep track of this or help keep track of this, as I already do so in my other league.
COL GM: 2043 - present
2063 World Champions
2061 NL Champions
mzylinski
Offline
Seattle Mariners GM/President of Operations
Posts: 4,054
Threads: 1,218
Joined: Jul 2010
I’m in agreement
 GM
'08- Current: Pirates GM Record
'56-'08: Seattle GM Record 4606-3510 .568 win%
'20-'32: San Francisco GM Record 875-1231 .415 win%
'10-'14: Minnesota GM Record 324-324 .500 win%
World Series Champion 2010, 2089, 2092, 2095
American League Champion 2010, 2062, 2089, 2092, 2093, 2095
Best Record Full Year (Regular Season and Playoffs Combined): 131-45 .744 win%
Winner of first ever FCM World Series
warpriest
Offline
Posts: 1,723
Threads: 495
Joined: Oct 2013
Rangers agree. Can also help keep track of DP's if necessary. Several times in the past I have contacted other teams to inform them they have a former Ranger-owned picks which fell thru the cracks.
erick1174
Offline
Detroit Tigers GM / 2011, 2079, 2098, and 2112 WS Champions
Posts: 1,952
Threads: 753
Joined: Jul 2010
I see this isnt an actual poll.... but I still would be all for this.
hickoxb2
Offline
Los Angeles Dodgers GM
Posts: 1,466
Threads: 469
Joined: Aug 2012
I voted against it, but my only concern is that it will be abused and ruin a franchise for a decade. I acknowledge that we do have a very stable crop of GMs here, but all it takes is one to really mess things up. That hesitation aside though, I support it.
Los Angeles Dodgers GM
mattynokes
Offline
Cleveland Guardians GM
Posts: 8,981
Threads: 4,308
Joined: Feb 2011
(08-22-2019, 09:58 PM)hickoxb2 Wrote: I voted against it, but my only concern is that it will be abused and ruin a franchise for a decade. I acknowledge that we do have a very stable crop of GMs here, but all it takes is one to really mess things up. That hesitation aside though, I support it.
I'm not sure that you can ruin a franchise for a decade by being able to trade (basically) one draft class a little earlier than normal. If you're talking multiple years being able to be traded, sure. But any ruining can still be accomplished in the off-season.
Cleveland Record: 5631-4946 (.532) [2054-2071, 2083-2104, 2110-2135]
AL Post: 16 (ALC), 11 (WC) - ALDS Win: 12 - ALCS Champ: 7 - WS Champ: 4
ALW: Mariners + Angels Record: 1072-864 (.554) [2042-2048, 2105-2110]
AL Post: 3 (ALW), 4 (WC) - ALDS Win: 3 - ALCS Champ: 1 - WS Champ: 1
NLW: Rockies + Padres Record: 3230-2753 (.540) [2017-2042, 2072-2082]
NL Post: 18 (NLW), 4 (WC) - NLDS Win: 7 - NLCS Champ: 4 - WS Champ: 0
AndyP
Offline
Commissioner/7 time Champion
Posts: 15,174
Threads: 3,848
Joined: Jul 2010
There are 6 no votes, I'd like to hear from them.
World Champion 2018, 2021, 2026, 2030, 2035, 2037, 2039
AL Champion 12 times
FCM Best Record-Holder - 121-41 2028
Overall Record: 3530-1978 .641%
sxr007
Offline
Posts: 3,004
Threads: 771
Joined: Jan 2012
08-25-2019, 11:44 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-25-2019, 11:46 AM by sxr007.)
I voted No. I am a traditionalist. I like to keep our game as close to the real game as possible.
I also see where this creates even more of a competitive imbalance each year. Some teams will get much better the year they trade their draft picks. Others will be more inclined to go to rebuild stage accumulating more picks.
I see it as one more thing to keep track of. One more thing that creates more time needing spent on the game.
In summary:
If it ain't broke don't fix it.
Dodgers 2036 - Present
Padres 2026-2035
23 NL West Championships
9 Wild Cards
National League Champion 2057, 2060, 2095, 2115
WORLD SERIES CHAMPION 2057
|
