CHW DET

mav3rek · 02-12-2012, 02:00 AM

I thought the rule was that players traded after April 1st aren't eligible for comp? So if they go to FA there wouldn't be comp.

***AndyP*** · 02-12-2012, 02:48 AM

(02-12-2012, 02:00 AM)mav3rek Wrote: I thought the rule was that players traded after April 1st aren't eligible for comp? So if they go to FA there wouldn't be comp.

Right, the idea was that these are basically rentals, which is part of the problem.

***mattynokes*** · 02-12-2012, 02:54 AM

(02-12-2012, 12:52 AM)jps93 Wrote: this is a tough one...I think its a risk but i'd like to see how it plays out

approve

Ending up in the red and not being able to re-sign at least one of the players is likely where this plays out for Detroit.

***AndyP*** · 02-12-2012, 01:35 PM

I have to switch to a veto. Matty's financial argument is compelling to say the least. Detroit already sits overbudget and this deal will not fix that. I can't, in good conscience, approve a league-controlled team going into debt. That's an awful precedent.

Veto