07-06-2021, 11:10 AM
The following changes will take effect after Spring Training of 2110:
1. League Revenue will decline by 10% to -20%
2. Revenue sharing will jump by 20%
Using 2108 as a guide here are 10 teams to show how this would play out:
Rev No Changes Sharing No Changes Expected Payroll Rev W/ Changes Sharing With Expected Payroll
LAA - 248M -42.5M 206M 233M -49 184M
BOS - 194M -15.5M 179M 178M -11.2 167M
WAS - 211M -24M 187M 210M -32.9 177.1M
SFG - 227M -32M 195M 219M -39.2 179.8M
DET - 169M -3M 166M 158M +2.5 160.5M
KCR - 120M +21.5M 141.5M 107M +39.2 139.2M
CHW - 85M +39M 124M 80M +58.1 138.1M
CIN - 88M +37.5M 125.5M 85M +54.6 139.6M
PIT - 113M +25M 138M 107M +39.2 139.2M
STL - 100M +31.5M 131.5M 94M +48.3 142.3M
If you're wondering why some teams fluctuate oddly, I didn't run perfect sims based on performances on purpose. Here you can see what happens to a KC team that overperformed in the "No Changes" sim versus underperforming in the Changes sim. Their payroll stayed roughly the same but that still indicates that KC won't be damaged as badly by rough years as they have in the past. Cincy, by contrast, performed almost identically in the two sims and you can see a 14M jump in available payroll. Ditto St. Louis.
On the upper end you can see this with Washington who performed much better in the changes sim so that their revenue barely dipped. Even with that they see a dip in expected payroll. Boston performed roughly the same so you can see the effect on their payroll.
This will give our lower revenue clubs more wiggle room and less wiggle room for error on the upper end. Cash will be better redistributed and payrolls are closer, but not perfectly, aligned. You still see 50M gaps between the top and bottom clubs, but more of them are in the 160 range than previously.
You got two full seasons to be ready for it in 2110!
1. League Revenue will decline by 10% to -20%
2. Revenue sharing will jump by 20%
Using 2108 as a guide here are 10 teams to show how this would play out:
Rev No Changes Sharing No Changes Expected Payroll Rev W/ Changes Sharing With Expected Payroll
LAA - 248M -42.5M 206M 233M -49 184M
BOS - 194M -15.5M 179M 178M -11.2 167M
WAS - 211M -24M 187M 210M -32.9 177.1M
SFG - 227M -32M 195M 219M -39.2 179.8M
DET - 169M -3M 166M 158M +2.5 160.5M
KCR - 120M +21.5M 141.5M 107M +39.2 139.2M
CHW - 85M +39M 124M 80M +58.1 138.1M
CIN - 88M +37.5M 125.5M 85M +54.6 139.6M
PIT - 113M +25M 138M 107M +39.2 139.2M
STL - 100M +31.5M 131.5M 94M +48.3 142.3M
If you're wondering why some teams fluctuate oddly, I didn't run perfect sims based on performances on purpose. Here you can see what happens to a KC team that overperformed in the "No Changes" sim versus underperforming in the Changes sim. Their payroll stayed roughly the same but that still indicates that KC won't be damaged as badly by rough years as they have in the past. Cincy, by contrast, performed almost identically in the two sims and you can see a 14M jump in available payroll. Ditto St. Louis.
On the upper end you can see this with Washington who performed much better in the changes sim so that their revenue barely dipped. Even with that they see a dip in expected payroll. Boston performed roughly the same so you can see the effect on their payroll.
This will give our lower revenue clubs more wiggle room and less wiggle room for error on the upper end. Cash will be better redistributed and payrolls are closer, but not perfectly, aligned. You still see 50M gaps between the top and bottom clubs, but more of them are in the 160 range than previously.
You got two full seasons to be ready for it in 2110!
World Champion 2018, 2021, 2026, 2030, 2035, 2037, 2039
AL Champion 12 times
FCM Best Record-Holder - 121-41 2028
Overall Record: 3530-1978 .641%
AL Champion 12 times
FCM Best Record-Holder - 121-41 2028
Overall Record: 3530-1978 .641%