LAD/ATL - Printable Version +- First Class Mogul (https://www.firstclassmogul.com) +-- Forum: General Manager's Office (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=26) +--- Forum: Trade Central (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=32) +---- Forum: Trades Vetoed (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=36) +---- Thread: LAD/ATL (/showthread.php?tid=14080) |
LAD/ATL - mav3rek - 07-05-2012 LAD Gets: ------------------ ATL 1st (3rd OVR) ATL 4th (93rd OVR) ATL Gets: ------------------ OF Tom Wilber (65/86) SP Jim Chrichton (61/86) I accept. Get to move up in the draft and restock the farm a bit with a prospect I like better than these 2 guys. RE: LAD/ATL - piazza31 - 07-05-2012 :ATL: accepts like both specs more than the draft picks RE: LAD/ATL - jhc54 - 07-05-2012 Veto ATL needs more RE: LAD/ATL - AndyP - 07-05-2012 So I either vote how I think and piazza acts like a two year old or I approve and compromise all integrity? Cute situation. I'll let the admins who like to baby piazza handle this. RE: LAD/ATL - piazza31 - 07-05-2012 (07-05-2012, 07:21 PM)AndyP Wrote: So I either vote how I think and piazza acts like a two year old or I approve and compromise all integrity?so let me get this right, hold all integrity hmm what integrity do you have making fun of gms as one with a position in power, yet you do w/e you like in this league, a two year old is immature yet last time i checked you can't approve or veto a deal w/o acting that way, you yourself lose integrity to this league by acting like the rule is trying to pervent (07-05-2012, 07:13 PM)jhc54 Wrote: Veto ATL needs more this is mature and respectful, I don't get mad at vetoes like this maybe if certain mods acted like this RE: LAD/ATL - AndyP - 07-05-2012 VETO. I'll save you the embarrassment of me scanning the trade forums for your past rants to reasonable vetos. It would've been fun though. RE: LAD/ATL - hokeyrules - 07-06-2012 VETO for above reasons RE: LAD/ATL - GoIrish - 07-06-2012 veto'd |