Baltimore/Atlanta - Printable Version +- First Class Mogul (https://www.firstclassmogul.com) +-- Forum: General Manager's Office (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=26) +--- Forum: Trade Central (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=32) +---- Forum: Trades In-File (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=35) +---- Thread: Baltimore/Atlanta (/showthread.php?tid=13891) |
Baltimore/Atlanta - arod12 - 06-23-2012 :BAL: Sending : RP Cory Matteson 86 9.0M until 2032 4.9M until 2031 :ATL: Sending : C Daryl Holdswroth 77/84 25,000K until 2032 RP Frankie Mena 61/85 15,000K until 2032 RP Boris Wadley 77/86 500K until 2032 accept - Matteson is a good RP but i'm rebuilding. I get a under-rated catcher, a RP with good vitals, and a good RP spec RE: Baltimore/Atlanta - piazza31 - 06-23-2012 :ATL: accepts gains cash and a good rp for a spec i gave up on, and 2 decent rp specs RE: Baltimore/Atlanta - jps93 - 06-23-2012 approve RE: Baltimore/Atlanta - AndyP - 06-23-2012 Sorry, but I said after the last one I'm taking a stand against these "payments for multiple years" stuff. Either workout a one time cash payment or no cash. These things always turn into a mess down the lines and they're just not realistic. RE: Baltimore/Atlanta - piazza31 - 06-23-2012 (06-23-2012, 10:41 PM)AndyP Wrote: Sorry, but I said after the last one I'm taking a stand against these "payments for multiple years" stuff. Either workout a one time cash payment or no cash. These things always turn into a mess down the lines and they're just not realistic. Can an Admin make a ruling here, i hate this whole mods can do whatever they want to BS RE: Baltimore/Atlanta - AndyP - 06-23-2012 I'll explain it simply: I don't like watching new GMs have to shell out cash to other teams based on agreements from a prior GM. Florida, for example, just got 10M from a new GM for a deal they never agreed to. It's not fair to strap new GMs with those obligations. It's also a huge headache for everyone to keep track of. Either make the cash payments a one time deal, or don't deal cash. RE: Baltimore/Atlanta - mattynokes - 06-24-2012 I don't have a problem with cash payments as long as the player is clearly overpaid and needs cash included in order to be traded. But this is petty. Just include the 9.8M now. RE: Baltimore/Atlanta - hokeyrules - 06-24-2012 I approve either way. RE: Baltimore/Atlanta - GoIrish - 06-24-2012 I can see and understand where Andy is coming from with this. Especially with the Texas and Chicago deals that are paying Florida 10M a season. Also with the deal between ARZ and ATL. ARZ went on a little break and that caused a headache of trying to keep up with it. It also really does hurt new owners, So I think we should try and stay away from long term payment agreements. Lets limit it to a shorter term, I say either 1 lump sum or over 2 seasons (now and next offseason). Sean RE: Baltimore/Atlanta - GoIrish - 06-25-2012 done |