+- First Class Mogul (https://www.firstclassmogul.com)
+-- Forum: General Manager's Office (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=26)
+--- Forum: Trade Central (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=32)
+---- Forum: Trades Vetoed (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=36)
+---- Thread: CHW TEX (/showthread.php?tid=13359)
CHW TEX - jhc54 - 05-27-2012
TEX receives:
SP Luke Wadley 23 YO (82/92) earning min
SP Tomasz Martinez 22 YO (63/78) earning min
CHW receives:
SP Tomasz Torres (70/87) 22 YO earning min
SS Nelson Hayter (82) earning 2.66 mill through the year
3rd round pick
I get Torres and the third for Wadley. Hayter is literally a throw in that I am taking and paying very little for.
I trade the guy who is currently the best arguably (Wadley) for a guy who might be better long term, though there is no guarantee (Torres). If this is the cost for Torres so be it.
RE: CHW TEX - kc1 - 05-27-2012
(05-27-2012, 06:55 PM)jhc54 Wrote: TEX receives:
SP Luke Wadley 23 YO (82/92) earning min
SP Tomasz Martinez 22 YO (63/78) earning min
CHW receives:
SP Tomasz Torres (70/87) 22 YO earning min
SS Nelson Hayter (82) earning 2.66 mill through the year
3rd round pick
I get Torres and the third for Wadley. Hayter is literally a throw in that I am taking and paying very little for.
I trade the guy who is currently the best arguably (Wadley) for a guy who might be better long term, though there is no guarantee (Torres). If this is the cost for Torres so be it.
We accept, We get a solid replacement for Torres in Wadley, Hayter's a guy on our trade block who we don't want, and we got a guy in Martinez who could develop more than we expect him to.
RE: CHW TEX - jhc54 - 05-27-2012
Forgot draft picks cant be traded till after the sim. So can we put this in after the sim?
RE: CHW TEX - hokeyrules - 05-27-2012
veto wadley is a major bust.
RE: CHW TEX - jps93 - 05-27-2012
approve after Sim 2
RE: CHW TEX - mattynokes - 05-28-2012
Veto
It seems now it's getting to the point where each sim it's trade just to make some trades and not having a real plan in place.
RE: CHW TEX - AndyP - 05-28-2012
More explanation. kc your post essentially said: "what the hell, we swapped dudes" Considering Wadleys limited future this deserves more thought.
RE: CHW TEX - jhc54 - 05-28-2012
(05-27-2012, 07:33 PM)hokeyrules Wrote: veto wadley is a major bust.
Wow and to think that I thought I got my ass kicked during that trade.
And I'm not sure where Wadley was drafted should have any bearing on this trade. But I guess it does? So this is another thing I need to consider when making a trade. Where my pick was taken. Good to know.