COL-BAL Trade - Printable Version +- First Class Mogul (https://www.firstclassmogul.com) +-- Forum: General Manager's Office (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=26) +--- Forum: Trade Central (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=32) +---- Forum: Trades Vetoed (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=36) +---- Thread: COL-BAL Trade (/showthread.php?tid=10541) |
COL-BAL Trade - mattynokes - 01-13-2012 :COL: Gets: LF Brian Ward 58/85 (Age 19) - $Draft Day $1.4 Million :BAL: Gets: SP Keith George 83 (Age 29) - $7.5M thru '26 ---------- I like Ward's potential and switch hitting ability. RE: COL-BAL Trade - arod12 - 01-13-2012 had 2 many lf in system and in the bigs and george was a nice twist RE: COL-BAL Trade - GoIrish - 01-13-2012 done RE: COL-BAL Trade - hokeyrules - 01-14-2012 I am going to say this should be undone. For a few reasons. 1) Matty vetoed my deal with ATL where its a salary dump, and this clearly is. 2) This is a terrible deal for Baltimore. 3) No trade mods approved this. Anyways I am going to post this and see what the other mods think, I already know that one of them I discussed this with agreed that it should be vetoed because of number 3. RE: COL-BAL Trade - AndyP - 01-14-2012 Um, yeah, I definitely would have vetoed this had I the time before the sim. Bad deal, makes no sense, plus PR never even accepted! I know Sean was rushed into doing the sim, so totally understandable - I just think this should be put back up for vote and the players returned. Since neither team is contending, it shouldn't constitute a re-sim either. RE: COL-BAL Trade - jps93 - 01-14-2012 ditto RE: COL-BAL Trade - mattynokes - 01-15-2012 This being undone because of a different veto is a complete joke. No, George is not a total salary dump. Overpaid, sure, but he did have a nice HR/9, BB/9, K/9, and OBA in COL. Outside if COL those numbers should only get better. Plus if Baltimore makes some nice moves in the off-season, he'll have George in '26 that could have him in contention. |