+- First Class Mogul (https://www.firstclassmogul.com)
+-- Forum: General (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: League Suggestions (https://www.firstclassmogul.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=12)
+--- Thread: In addition to rocky's suggestion (/showthread.php?tid=25367)
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - mike - 06-03-2014
On the moving finances back again, personally I don't think we need it. For my team we have shaved off at least 2 seasons worth of me being able to overspend on my current cash reserve (in game cash plus my bank) and that's with me not adding any salary.
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - AndyP - 06-03-2014
We will test another decrease to see where we're at. At some point it'd be nice to force teams to make more financial decisions.
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - Steal Third - 06-03-2014
What was decided on the original #5? And what does that mean exactly...for example, sometimes you hold your offer a few times and the player eventually accepts. So are we talking 3 "different" offers or 3 total offers AND attempts? Because I don't like it if it is the later one.
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - AndyP - 06-03-2014
We're not doing number 5.
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - sxr007 - 06-04-2014
(06-03-2014, 05:08 PM)AndyP Wrote: We'll try 2/16 for next year in addition to tightening finances slightly again and see where we're at.
So we will have to offer fallback for a type A player at 2 years @ 16 million? Will we have to sign him at 2 years @ 16 million? Either way this really hurts the value of the older players. Why take the risk on having to sign older players to 2 years?
Will Type B still be 1 year @ 8 million?
And for Mike to say it doesn't matter, he is wrong. Example:
I signed SP John Haller on a 1 year @ 16 million through Type A free agency last year. I was hoping he would have a great year and if my younger starters develop to offer Haller Type A or Type B. With a 2 @ 16 million dollar deal having to be offered and his age at 34, I don't see that happening. So, a quick rule change will interfere with my original plan.
Will budgets be tighting more next year? With the trade deadline looming, I would like to know before I added any salary.
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - AndyP - 06-04-2014
Type A will be 2/16 for qualifying offer. Type B will be 1/8. Older players should be Type B, so yes it does devalue them....but that's part of the point. They are overvalued right now so we're trying to level it.
I experimented with some things last night, I think right now the file will stay as is through 2047. I want to let things play out a bit. Another -10% dip looked to cut league profits in half, I'm not sure I want that drastic of a measure.