Atlbravesfan27
Offline
Trade Mod / Braves GM
Posts: 3,541
Threads: 859
Joined: Sep 2010
All of that is not needed in my opinion
Peter
Offline
GM of the Alexandria Nationals of Washington of the District of Columbia/Gentleman
Posts: 3,651
Threads: 1,641
Joined: Feb 2011
(09-14-2011, 11:41 AM)Atlbravesfan27 Wrote: All of that is not needed in my opinion
agreed
World Champs: 2071, 2106, 2108
rockybull
Offline
New York Yankees GM
Posts: 2,461
Threads: 1,179
Joined: Jan 2011
hell no hokey, that is fucking stupid. No reason for myself to play in a league that has that rule in place, I might as well take my things and say adios, cause thats just dumb and I won't play in a league that stupid.
dlee2499
Offline
Ex Philadelphia / San Francisco GM, 3-time FCM Champion
Posts: 791
Threads: 192
Joined: Aug 2011
agree. i don't see a problem. if we have mods, then let them do their job. if not, then let all trades go through.
dejota
Offline
Admin / Astros GM / 2012 & 2016 Champion
Posts: 3,836
Threads: 554
Joined: Jul 2010
Not of a fan on penalizing teams for bad trades in principal. Nobody actively seeks out to destroy franchises/leagues but it's potential pitfall for every league.
Houston Astros - 2012/2016/2023/2025 Champs!
Cumulative Record: 1894 - 1184 (.615%)
GoIrish
Offline
6 Time Champion
Posts: 2,651
Threads: 540
Joined: Jul 2010
I agree with DJ on this, does not make sense because part of human nature is to get the best deal possible. I have over-paid on some deals when I feel I need something and I have made others pay more than what they were willing to pay for trades. You cannot fault someone for trying to get the best deal that they can. All we can do is watch the new owners and make sure they have a clue in how to deal, which is why we have trade mods.
Cubs GM 2010-2021
2017 & 2019 World Champions
LAA GM 2022-2035
2028, 2029, 2032 and 2034 World Champions
AndyP
Offline
Commissioner/7 time Champion
Posts: 14,643
Threads: 3,653
Joined: Jul 2010
(09-14-2011, 06:10 PM)GoIrish Wrote: I agree with DJ on this, does not make sense because part of human nature is to get the best deal possible. I have over-paid on some deals when I feel I need something and I have made others pay more than what they were willing to pay for trades. You cannot fault someone for trying to get the best deal that they can. All we can do is watch the new owners and make sure they have a clue in how to deal, which is why we have trade mods.
Which is also the source of most trade vetos.
The only other time trade vetos become an issue is when we have GMs that try to circumvent NTCs and generally be an ass about how they treat their players. (Which would have much more dramatic effects in real life)
I honestly think it's laughable that we're even discussing this.
World Champion 2018, 2021, 2026, 2030, 2035, 2037, 2039
AL Champion 12 times
FCM Best Record-Holder - 121-41 2028
Overall Record: 3530-1978 .641%
erick1174
Offline
Detroit Tigers GM / 2011, 2079, 2098, and 2112 WS Champions
Posts: 1,848
Threads: 695
Joined: Jul 2010
(09-14-2011, 06:10 PM)GoIrish Wrote: I agree with DJ on this, does not make sense because part of human nature is to get the best deal possible. I have over-paid on some deals when I feel I need something and I have made others pay more than what they were willing to pay for trades. You cannot fault someone for trying to get the best deal that they can. All we can do is watch the new owners and make sure they have a clue in how to deal, which is why we have trade mods.
Well, I too agree you shouldnt penalize the team trying to get the best deal they can. The only time I see penalizing a GM is if they continually agree to trades where they dont get near as much for their player as they should be getting. That is the kind of GM that is hurting his team and hurting the league. The GM trying to get the best for his team should not be blamed. Do you expect a GM to say no to a deal that he is offered just because his team is getting helped out too much?? Of course not. Its the bad GMs that you need to penalize and eventually get rid of for not being good enough, if they make a habit of the bad trades.
|
