'PR'
Offline
Boston Red Sox GM
Posts: 2,434
Threads: 615
Joined: Jul 2010
I think it's been discussed before, but I just want to put the suggestion out there. 89 overall players can be just as good as 91 or 92 overall guys and cost 1/3 of the price. Kind of lopsided there. Also if we were to implement it, should there be a cost limit to the type B players? The new compensation thing was a bust, but I think it's safe to agree that agents for type B guys, or Agents for guys that are just 88 and 89 overall would be a good suggestion.
Scott
Offline
Twins GM
Posts: 1,232
Threads: 188
Joined: Jul 2010
We don't have the time. Unless someone wants to step up and do it
'PR'
Offline
Boston Red Sox GM
Posts: 2,434
Threads: 615
Joined: Jul 2010
Step up and do what? Be the player agent? I'll do it no problem, you know I can always help the league.
mike
Offline
Florida Marlins GM - Holds record for most times to quit and come back
Posts: 3,931
Threads: 1,225
Joined: Jul 2010
I voted yes but I'd settle for just the 88 and 89 rated players. It wouldn't add that much more work and if you already have a volunteer then I wouldn't see a problem.
'PR'
Offline
Boston Red Sox GM
Posts: 2,434
Threads: 615
Joined: Jul 2010
No responses for the No's?
Corey
Offline
Toronto Blue Jays GM / 2-Time Champ (2033, 2050)
Posts: 2,439
Threads: 532
Joined: Jul 2010
I voted yes but only for players rated 88 and 89. Although I also see a problem with this though if agents start asking for large contracts from these type of players. These players can be good players but they are also more suited as role players, not superstars.
Jeff Francoeur is 89, but if the agent wanted David Wright type money then he would be a free agent in a heart beat.
'PR'
Offline
Boston Red Sox GM
Posts: 2,434
Threads: 615
Joined: Jul 2010
09-19-2010, 04:42 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-19-2010, 04:43 PM by 'PR'.)
That's the thing, they will have lesser contracts because they aren't 90+. I'm willing to do the agent job.
Right now we have 5 for the idea and 3 not for it.
dejota
Offline
Admin / Astros GM / 2012 & 2016 Champion
Posts: 3,836
Threads: 554
Joined: Jul 2010
09-19-2010, 04:43 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-19-2010, 04:44 PM by dejota.)
Well the lack of resounding no's makes me feel good about how I've handled the agent process to date. I'm down but I'd like somebody else to play that agent if possible since I shouldn't have a monopoly on those decisions. I've already outsourced Boras, so if we have a volunteer and the league feels the system works then I'm fine with it (I voted 88/89 to have agents)
Houston Astros - 2012/2016/2023/2025 Champs!
Cumulative Record: 1894 - 1184 (.615%)
'PR'
Offline
Boston Red Sox GM
Posts: 2,434
Threads: 615
Joined: Jul 2010
09-19-2010, 04:46 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-19-2010, 04:47 PM by 'PR'.)
Idk, if the guys here in the league are fine with me as an agent then yea. If they'd like someone else that wouldn't be any problem. The rule is a good one to be implemented and that's what I'm aiming for.
'PR'
Offline
Boston Red Sox GM
Posts: 2,434
Threads: 615
Joined: Jul 2010
come on bro, no explanation for the No's? Seriously?
|
