This is the new suggestion:
Do away with trade modding. Every argument stems from that and who needs that in a league that is for fun.
Instead go with this:
- Every trade goes through no matter how lopsided.
- If there is an outcry on a trade then GM's PM the commish and the commish only so unless DJ every resigns then you PM him.
- After enough outcry's DJ then looks into the trade. I'd say if more than 7 GM's say it was complete screwjob then it should be looked at.
- If he deems it was a complete and utter screw job there is then punishments to the teams involved. I repeat i mean a real screwjob not just something controversial.
Veteran fleeces newby: Veteran is fined signifcantly to the extent of cash, pick(s) or both. Newby is verablly warned. Cash, pick(s) or both is given to the newby team to compensate and or overcompensate for what happened. If this happens again then the newby is booted and the vet is fined more harshly this time and/or booted aswell.
Veteran to Veteran: No real concerns should stem here unless it is collusion. If it is deemed collusion both teams are forced to draft 29 and 30th or have their picks auctioned off. If it happens again they are both booted. If its not collusion then verablly warn each team and fine if neccassary.
- Open up a mentor program
- Any Gm can volunteer to be mentor as long as they have 5 seasons under their belt here. In that time the GM should have gained a good knowledge on trade value.
- If we see a newby getting screwed then we suggest he ask a mentor for help before trading again. Or anything he wants help in like FA.
Having DJ decide the fines and if he thinks a trade is worth looking into will give at the very least consistency. A mentor program will show newby's that we encourage people to ask for advice. This should all help promote not to fleece eachother in teh first place as if you do, you stand to lose something other than just having a deal veto'd.
Do away with trade modding. Every argument stems from that and who needs that in a league that is for fun.
Instead go with this:
- Every trade goes through no matter how lopsided.
- If there is an outcry on a trade then GM's PM the commish and the commish only so unless DJ every resigns then you PM him.
- After enough outcry's DJ then looks into the trade. I'd say if more than 7 GM's say it was complete screwjob then it should be looked at.
- If he deems it was a complete and utter screw job there is then punishments to the teams involved. I repeat i mean a real screwjob not just something controversial.
Veteran fleeces newby: Veteran is fined signifcantly to the extent of cash, pick(s) or both. Newby is verablly warned. Cash, pick(s) or both is given to the newby team to compensate and or overcompensate for what happened. If this happens again then the newby is booted and the vet is fined more harshly this time and/or booted aswell.
Veteran to Veteran: No real concerns should stem here unless it is collusion. If it is deemed collusion both teams are forced to draft 29 and 30th or have their picks auctioned off. If it happens again they are both booted. If its not collusion then verablly warn each team and fine if neccassary.
- Open up a mentor program
- Any Gm can volunteer to be mentor as long as they have 5 seasons under their belt here. In that time the GM should have gained a good knowledge on trade value.
- If we see a newby getting screwed then we suggest he ask a mentor for help before trading again. Or anything he wants help in like FA.
Having DJ decide the fines and if he thinks a trade is worth looking into will give at the very least consistency. A mentor program will show newby's that we encourage people to ask for advice. This should all help promote not to fleece eachother in teh first place as if you do, you stand to lose something other than just having a deal veto'd.