Peter
Offline
GM of the Alexandria Nationals of Washington of the District of Columbia/Gentleman
Posts: 3,651
Threads: 1,641
Joined: Feb 2011
HOU gets
CF Marc Stephens 69/92 21 yo min
OAK gets
LF Matt Kemp 79 33 yo 12 mil
P Wil Pasamonte 71/92 21 yo min
PIT gets
P Ty Auxier 61/85 19 yo min
i accept i wanted to do this deal to get out of the kemp contract and i had to give up a top line spect to do so and thats fine with me.
World Champs: 2071, 2106, 2108
dejota
Offline
Admin / Astros GM / 2012 & 2016 Champion
Posts: 3,778
Threads: 548
Joined: Jul 2010
With my Big Young 4 (MacBeath, Fuents, Garcia and Cassidy) looking better than ever. I have no strong CF prospects so I deal from strength for a weakness, easy.
Houston Astros - 2012/2016/2023/2025 Champs!
Cumulative Record: 1894 - 1184 (.615%)
Cdawg
Offline
Oakland Athletics GM
Posts: 594
Threads: 182
Joined: Oct 2010
agree I'm more just helping out a fellow GM than really benefiting my team. Pasamonte will start the pitching revolution in Oakland and while I think Auxier will be better in the long run, Pasamonte should hit the majors sooner.
Kemp is just someone to help out Pit b/c I feel sorry for him.
Oakland A's
2015-Current
(18 seasons)
1,340-1,577
74-.44-87.66
4 AL West titles
2 ALDS Series appearance
1 WS appearance
AndyP
Offline
Commissioner/7 time Champion
Posts: 15,187
Threads: 3,851
Joined: Jul 2010
danpac47
Offline
Trade Mod / Red Sox GM
Posts: 786
Threads: 92
Joined: Aug 2010
veto. i don't like OAK reasons behind it.
hokeyrules
Offline
Admin / Former Marlins HOF GM / Former Rangers GM/ Current Jays GM
Posts: 5,464
Threads: 1,062
Joined: Jul 2010
wait why is Oakland giving up auxier then?
Peter
Offline
GM of the Alexandria Nationals of Washington of the District of Columbia/Gentleman
Posts: 3,651
Threads: 1,641
Joined: Feb 2011
he said he was fine including auxier as a mid level spect to upgrade to the top pitching spect that he got from houston and he was going to take kemp that was obviously the basis of the deal. Oakland wont really need to be paying anybody until they are in contention again so him taking kemp wasn't really going to be eating away at resources that were going to be needed before his contract actually runs out
World Champs: 2071, 2106, 2108
hokeyrules
Offline
Admin / Former Marlins HOF GM / Former Rangers GM/ Current Jays GM
Posts: 5,464
Threads: 1,062
Joined: Jul 2010
He is barely upgrading and taking on a contract which is my concern, I will hold off my vote until Oak explains why he is fine giving up the prospect. My thought right now is PIT gets no one, and then HOU and OAK get the prospects based on the deal.
Peter
Offline
GM of the Alexandria Nationals of Washington of the District of Columbia/Gentleman
Posts: 3,651
Threads: 1,641
Joined: Feb 2011
(03-28-2011, 06:05 PM)hokeyrules Wrote: He is barely upgrading and taking on a contract which is my concern, I will hold off my vote until Oak explains why he is fine giving up the prospect. My thought right now is PIT gets no one, and then HOU and OAK get the prospects based on the deal.
i honestly didnt really see that prospect as even that impressive so i guess i dont really even care
World Champs: 2071, 2106, 2108
Atlbravesfan27
Offline
Trade Mod / Braves GM
Posts: 3,652
Threads: 903
Joined: Sep 2010
|
