Poll: What would you have us do?

***AndyP*** · 07-12-2018, 01:37 PM

(07-12-2018, 01:21 PM)mattynokes Wrote:
(07-11-2018, 04:51 PM)AndyP Wrote: I would encourage everyone to take a look at the +20% file just for reference and post their thoughts.

Matty's idea about raising the in-game cash is a good one, but that is likely to hurt stadium funders most. But I'm open to that change.

(Or both that and the 20%)

I am pretty much 100% opposed to IFA.

I don't see how that hurts Stadium Funds. Teams that are trying to do that are still collecting money, whether they can bank starting at 30M or 50M. It'll just keep more money in the game instead of in the bank.

Just that teams trying to stockpile cash are going to have to hold more money in the game and that will alter how much money they make over the course of the season. (Higher cash total = lower revenues)

Poll: What would you have us do? You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Decrease to -20%	5.56%	1	5.56%
Increase player demands to +20%	33.33%	6	33.33%
Something more radical (discuss)	33.33%	6	33.33%
Nothing	27.78%	5	27.78%
Total		18 vote(s)	100%