A Couple of Suggestions

[AndyP]

as far as the 60 wins, i think it could be a bit unfair if one team is in a division with say 3 90 win teams or something, but yet their team is better overall but has say 58 wins and another team is in a division with the winner of division that only has say 85 wins, but they squeak by with 60 wins and not punished at all. i think it would be fair to do a judgment call and deem that 58 win team looks better than their record shows and not get punished.

I would consider all of these negotiable depending upon the actions of the general manager.

In retrospect, 50M may be a bit harsh, but some sort of penalty even for 60 wins seems like at least a push in the right direction.

I don't want some half-ass 51 win teams either that try to just skate by and then petition themselves away from the hard 50 win penalty. That's what I was trying to avoid.

I know I'm new and still learning the ins and outs of mogul, but maybe 0 penalty for 60 wins, 50M for 50 or less, and deduct 5M from the penalty for each win over 50. So, 51 wins would still be 45M penalty, 55 wins would be 25M penalty, 59 wins is 5M penalty, etc. That way even just edging out 51 wins is still a penalty, but still less severe than 50.

I'd be open to that as well.