10-14-2010, 10:34 PM
I will veto I still think SP > RP all the time you can talk to Andy or NYY to even prove this with me. So that is my biggest issue, as for other reasons, by reading Minneosta's last post it seems as if he had more time to think about he may not be willing to do it. However, if the two of you decide to just fix this deal a tad and both of you feel it is fair again and are willing to do it then my vote may be swayed, but this is not nearly as bad in my opinion as the Mauer one. Both of which I have vetoed.
Now logic wise I agree with both Andy and DJ on their thoughts on the deal. And in combination with Jordan where he said Gibson and Mauer > Webb & Montero
I think Gibson and Mauer > Webb and Ramos even, which makes it vetoable to me.
Sorry GoIrish.
I strongly believe that Mauer deal should be vetoed, and so I think if this deal is vetoed than the other one should be as well.
Now logic wise I agree with both Andy and DJ on their thoughts on the deal. And in combination with Jordan where he said Gibson and Mauer > Webb & Montero
I think Gibson and Mauer > Webb and Ramos even, which makes it vetoable to me.
Sorry GoIrish.
I strongly believe that Mauer deal should be vetoed, and so I think if this deal is vetoed than the other one should be as well.