• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
In addition to rocky's suggestion
#21
(05-24-2014, 05:19 PM)AndyP Wrote: Except what Cdawg said wasn't "extremely incorrect" and you strawmanned his position. His point was that virtually none of the Type A players were signed for only one year. The argument is that adding a second year would force team's hands, but most players are already getting 2 or more year offers. In fact, only 1 out of 16 have had that happen.

Your argument is that it would've taken a bit more cash each time or wouldn't have beaten those offers out, but the years are not the problem. As others are pointing out, most teams wouldn't have flinched at a bit more cash. In all likelihood all of those offers would've been beaten out because they are only mildly different than what would've been required.

You're arguing a counterfactual as if it's truth. Cdawgs point is actual truth - more than one year wasn't stopping anyone in the vast majority of cases.

i think the bigger issue is, would the same teams have offered Type A if it was 2/16? we don't know, i'm sure some would have, but i gotta believe not all would have, but again this is just speculating. Even if just a few of them that were offered Type A back then wouldn't have been offered Type A with the new system, that's a win IMO. You can't stop it all (in cases like the giants) but you should be able to stop a good bit. There just isn't much risk in a 1 year offer, especially for just decent pitchers.

We can speculate all day long about if these teams would have ponied up for the extra dough and/or extra year to have signed them or not, we don't have a damn clue either way, we're just speculating, which proves nothing. Only way to find out is to implement it and see how it goes going forward. I don't have a problem at all if it's not implemented, i think it would help the league, but honestly leaving it like it is helps me more, so whatever. I just hope that it either changes now or stays like this, cause it would suck to see this go on for another 4-8 mogul seasons where others take full advantage of this, then when i finally want to take advantage of it, then the league changes it to 2/16 or whatever, that would be very bittersweet, but whatever the league thinks is best.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)



Messages In This Thread
In addition to rocky's suggestion - by mattynokes - 05-08-2014, 01:06 PM
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - by AndyP - 05-08-2014, 06:39 PM
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - by sxr007 - 05-08-2014, 07:42 PM
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - by mike - 05-08-2014, 08:10 PM
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - by AndyP - 05-08-2014, 08:56 PM
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - by AndyP - 05-23-2014, 05:58 PM
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - by mike - 05-23-2014, 07:03 PM
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - by mike - 05-24-2014, 11:08 AM
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - by Cdawg - 05-24-2014, 12:15 PM
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - by AndyP - 05-24-2014, 05:19 PM
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - by rockybull - 05-24-2014, 05:43 PM
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - by Cdawg - 05-24-2014, 05:42 PM
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - by AndyP - 05-24-2014, 06:07 PM
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - by AndyP - 05-24-2014, 09:13 PM
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - by Cdawg - 05-24-2014, 09:19 PM
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - by mike - 05-25-2014, 03:40 AM
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - by mike - 06-03-2014, 04:18 PM
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - by AndyP - 06-03-2014, 05:08 PM
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - by sxr007 - 06-04-2014, 09:19 AM
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - by mike - 06-03-2014, 08:46 PM
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - by AndyP - 06-03-2014, 09:09 PM
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - by AndyP - 06-03-2014, 11:17 PM
RE: In addition to rocky's suggestion - by AndyP - 06-04-2014, 12:07 PM

Forum Jump: