• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
DET - WAS
#15
(02-16-2012, 02:51 AM)AndyP Wrote: I want to talk to Detroit more. The snowball of bad moves concern is a legit one. I really don't see how this move helps immediately, the near future, or the distant future. I'd make the case Detroit is worse in all three considerations. Especially in light of Macies' value.

I really appreciate and love what you're trying to do here Killa, I think it's awesome and I think with a veteran GM this would be a done deal. But moments after we vetoed an awful deal with Pitt, Strat was asking for spare pieces to help boost his team and then wham, this trade.

It just doesn't speak to a well thought-out plan. That's worrisome. I personally feel I can't vote until I hear what the idea is.

Its cause I'm here to have fun and vetoing is just part of the game. Nothing to get really upset about.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Messages In This Thread
DET - WAS - by KillaCal AKA JS - 02-16-2012, 12:35 AM
RE: DET - WAS - by Stratford - 02-16-2012, 12:39 AM
RE: DET - WAS - by hokeyrules - 02-16-2012, 12:40 AM
RE: DET - WAS - by KillaCal AKA JS - 02-16-2012, 12:42 AM
RE: DET - WAS - by Stratford - 02-16-2012, 12:44 AM
RE: DET - WAS - by hokeyrules - 02-16-2012, 12:44 AM
RE: DET - WAS - by KillaCal AKA JS - 02-16-2012, 12:54 AM
RE: DET - WAS - by Stratford - 02-16-2012, 12:55 AM
RE: DET - WAS - by hokeyrules - 02-16-2012, 01:00 AM
RE: DET - WAS - by KillaCal AKA JS - 02-16-2012, 01:07 AM
RE: DET - WAS - by mattynokes - 02-16-2012, 01:29 AM
RE: DET - WAS - by jps93 - 02-16-2012, 01:42 AM
RE: DET - WAS - by KillaCal AKA JS - 02-16-2012, 02:47 AM
RE: DET - WAS - by AndyP - 02-16-2012, 02:51 AM
RE: DET - WAS - by KillaCal AKA JS - 02-16-2012, 03:05 AM

Forum Jump: