12-16-2011, 07:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-16-2011, 07:50 PM by mattynokes.)
Compensation changes, sure, but Sandwich round, hell no. It's like the Rule V draft. It sounds nice and would be a great addition to the league, but the additional work probably isn't worth it.
I think the arbitration figures for SPs (and possibly RPs) need to different than regular position players. There's 150 starting pitchers while there's just 30 starters at a given defensive position. If we're using the top 7/15 for those with 30 starters at each position, I'd say something like the top 20/40 for SPs would be good (and maybe something like top 10/20 for RPs).
I think the arbitration figures for SPs (and possibly RPs) need to different than regular position players. There's 150 starting pitchers while there's just 30 starters at a given defensive position. If we're using the top 7/15 for those with 30 starters at each position, I'd say something like the top 20/40 for SPs would be good (and maybe something like top 10/20 for RPs).
Cleveland Record: 5304-4625 (.534) [2054-2071, 2083-2104, 2110-2131]
AL Post: 15 (ALC), 11 (WC) - ALDS Win: 11 - ALCS Champ: 6 - WS Champ: 3
ALW: Mariners + Angels Record: 1072-864 (.554) [2042-2048, 2105-2110]
AL Post: 3 (ALW), 4 (WC) - ALDS Win: 3 - ALCS Champ: 1 - WS Champ: 1
NLW: Rockies + Padres Record: 3230-2753 (.540) [2017-2042, 2072-2082]
NL Post: 18 (NLW), 4 (WC) - NLDS Win: 7 - NLCS Champ: 4 - WS Champ: 0