HOU-ATL

[AndyP]

lmao i get the "don't be rude or obnoxious" but really that has to take the cake from andy
My cincinatti deal had many reasons for being approved and i still agree with that, mods like you sicken me with your oh because we had one or 2 bad gms that every new gm must show his worth before making a "questionable deal" if you can't handle a gm questioning your job for being an asshole to every new gm than don't be a mod

Your first Cincinnatti deal was terrible. Horrible, foolish, and short-sided. This can be easily proven. A deal, with the same GM, netted MUCH more talent just a few days later. Hence, the value in that first deal was clearly poor because the other party had been willing to give up MUCH more, you just didn't have the sense to ask for it. So, again, a huge red flag on top of already growing concern over the Lomax deal.

I won't question a new GM if they are making sound moves that I can see the reason in, when deals present red flags - I will. You have presented plenty of red flags.

It is absolutely my job to make sure you don't wreck a team and then bail on them. Because we can't undo the damage if you do. We can only catch it in the act. That's my job and I ask questions to get you to show that you actually put thought into it. You brought attention to yourself with the wildly low value you got for Pulgarin the first time. That's your fault, now grow up and live with the consequence.

This deal is approved.