We're debating how the game processes data, this isn't a debatable topic it's just fact. You both are trying to have two conversations as if they're one topic. Talent caps and career paths cannot be addressed together. Both means of adjustment have completely separate outcomes and one isn't something I've done before. I think it's unfair that I'm being accused of being overzealous and rushing in blind on one hand while being persuaded to fix the problem with means I fully admit I don't grasp (and neither do you guys for that matter, at least any more than me). And then being told doing so is a bad thing. One solution has been done successfully, one has not. One accomplishes lowering total talent, one does not. But if FCM doesn't agree that's fine, but adjusting career paths when most everyone agrees it's solid doesn't make sense to me. Especially in the context of cumulative talent. Like I said from page 1 that's a completely different debate IMO and mixing the two results in this.
Either way consider it dropped it's not worth opening pandora's box to strive for realism at this point.
Either way consider it dropped it's not worth opening pandora's box to strive for realism at this point.
Houston Astros - 2012/2016/2023/2025 Champs!
Cumulative Record: 1894 - 1184 (.615%)
Cumulative Record: 1894 - 1184 (.615%)