10-05-2011, 12:19 PM
The goal of lowering talent caps is to help rebuilding teams if we just try to water down talent by stunting prospect growth we'd be making it more difficult on them. We'd also impact all 30 teams randomly since we won't be able to choose which prospects the game turns into a dud. I also don't fully understand how that would play out. Would the sliders just cap predicted peak stats or would the killing occur during development? I don't know but it seems riskier to me and it would actually hurt rebuilding teams since future prospects will have crappy vitals.
OTOH, lowering talent caps with volunteers/excess FAs we don't impact anybody unwillingly, it's proven to not wreak havoc on the file and will actually help rebuilding teams since they don't have to acquire as much talent to be relevant and the game will have fewer vitals (indirectly admittedly) to distribute it's finite number of stats to.
OTOH, lowering talent caps with volunteers/excess FAs we don't impact anybody unwillingly, it's proven to not wreak havoc on the file and will actually help rebuilding teams since they don't have to acquire as much talent to be relevant and the game will have fewer vitals (indirectly admittedly) to distribute it's finite number of stats to.
Houston Astros - 2012/2016/2023/2025 Champs!
Cumulative Record: 1894 - 1184 (.615%)
Cumulative Record: 1894 - 1184 (.615%)