03-31-2011, 12:19 PM
The difference here is that there was not a NTC signed as part of the extension signed with Fitzharindge.
I will say this, it looks poorly on the Angels that they would be in contention (kind of) and deal Fitz to a team that is not in contention (KC) fresh off signing that contract. But there is no betrayl of a NTC here, even though this represents an unrealistic situation.
Just my take.
I will say this, it looks poorly on the Angels that they would be in contention (kind of) and deal Fitz to a team that is not in contention (KC) fresh off signing that contract. But there is no betrayl of a NTC here, even though this represents an unrealistic situation.
Just my take.