01-14-2011, 12:48 AM
my point is that trades should not be based on how much a person can get. every mod knows when a deal is lopsided and when it's unfair. This is not one of those deals and everyone has agreed. it doesn't matter if someone thinks its "good" or not, if its not lopsided it should not be vetoed.
I've had plenty of ppl say "Oh I would have given you more" after my deals, but no one says shit when the guy is actually available, only when he's traded. This deal should be passed on the grounds that no one is getting shafted. IDC how "good" it is, it is not unfair and that point has not been disputed by anyone.
Also just keep in mind that the deadline is tomorrow and if this isn't passed I'll have no chance to re-do it. still think i have an outside shot at the WC...
I've had plenty of ppl say "Oh I would have given you more" after my deals, but no one says shit when the guy is actually available, only when he's traded. This deal should be passed on the grounds that no one is getting shafted. IDC how "good" it is, it is not unfair and that point has not been disputed by anyone.
Also just keep in mind that the deadline is tomorrow and if this isn't passed I'll have no chance to re-do it. still think i have an outside shot at the WC...