• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
CIN/OAK
#2
This trade might fall under the sign and trade rule, but in my argument, Reynolds has hit FA twice since I've had him and both times given back to me b/c of my accepting his fallback offer AND not one other team posting a bid on him during Off-season FA... that's my argument.

Anyway if it is allowed than I agree. Reynolds is a good guy to have on the team, but this allows me to dump 6M AND gain another 4.5M. It will help me bring back the 4 or so guys from this season that could use/need long term contracts like Lehman or Bumgarner.

AND if this trade does hit the sign and trade than let it be known that I'm aware and I guess veto it.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Messages In This Thread
CIN/OAK - by jps93 - 12-21-2010, 06:46 PM
RE: CIN/OAK - by Cdawg - 12-21-2010, 07:04 PM
RE: CIN/OAK - by 'PR' - 12-21-2010, 10:51 PM
RE: CIN/OAK - by AndyP - 12-21-2010, 10:34 PM
RE: CIN/OAK - by dejota - 12-21-2010, 10:55 PM

Forum Jump: