07-11-2018, 02:18 PM
Revenues/Demands: Anything done here will hurt the small market teams more than the larger markets. We certainly see some good players sign cheap, but we also see some average-to-solid players require more money than they're worth.
Winterball: I don't think 50M will entice people to use this avenue to spend money. Maybe a few times a team with 100M+ will use it, but I'd think they'd get better value out of buying picks/prospects and won't bother with it.
I'd rather see teams allowed to sell their WB slots for a set amount of cash and then the receiving team is charged a higher rate for using acquired WB slots. Something like WB slots can be traded for 5M and then acquired WB slots cost 20M (double).
IFA: I think this could be a good thing if it's done like GBA. In GBA there are no additional players added to the file. A few players are chosen from the Draft Pool and blind bids are sent in. Those players have their names changed to ALL CAPS, the winners are announced on Draft Day, and the players are signed to the winning team after the draft.
Cash: I think it'd be more beneficial to raise the In-Game cash minimum to put money in the bank to 50M, which will naturally raise player demands.
Winterball: I don't think 50M will entice people to use this avenue to spend money. Maybe a few times a team with 100M+ will use it, but I'd think they'd get better value out of buying picks/prospects and won't bother with it.
I'd rather see teams allowed to sell their WB slots for a set amount of cash and then the receiving team is charged a higher rate for using acquired WB slots. Something like WB slots can be traded for 5M and then acquired WB slots cost 20M (double).
IFA: I think this could be a good thing if it's done like GBA. In GBA there are no additional players added to the file. A few players are chosen from the Draft Pool and blind bids are sent in. Those players have their names changed to ALL CAPS, the winners are announced on Draft Day, and the players are signed to the winning team after the draft.
Cash: I think it'd be more beneficial to raise the In-Game cash minimum to put money in the bank to 50M, which will naturally raise player demands.
Cleveland Record: 5304-4625 (.534) [2054-2071, 2083-2104, 2110-2131]
AL Post: 15 (ALC), 11 (WC) - ALDS Win: 11 - ALCS Champ: 6 - WS Champ: 3
ALW: Mariners + Angels Record: 1072-864 (.554) [2042-2048, 2105-2110]
AL Post: 3 (ALW), 4 (WC) - ALDS Win: 3 - ALCS Champ: 1 - WS Champ: 1
NLW: Rockies + Padres Record: 3230-2753 (.540) [2017-2042, 2072-2082]
NL Post: 18 (NLW), 4 (WC) - NLDS Win: 7 - NLCS Champ: 4 - WS Champ: 0