(11-16-2010, 06:27 PM)ezpkns34 Wrote: Making players peak later would put an end to the 2 year rebuilding. No team should be able to blow up their entire team, bring in all spects, and be able to start winning in 2 seasons like we've seen. The spects should take time to develop into MLB-ready players, making people think twice about going into a true rebuild
The two year rebuilding process happens when a team keeps rotating pieces, bringing in impact players and such. It also very much depends on what specs you have on your squad, how old and developed they are. If your a team like Seattle, Pittsburgh or Washington, who are examples of teams who have been sitting on their specs, it's taken more than just 2 years to complete a rebuild. Me and Sean have had success pretty early because we paid money or specs to gain impact players, or players that when combined become a solid team. Most clubs aren't doing that, most clubs are sitting on their specs. I haven't really seen a club who has completely rebuilt in 2 years other than my lucky ass and Sean, who very well may have to move the impact pieces he just dealt. Pittsburgh was rebuilding for about 5 seasons I believe, and if not it at least took 3-4 seasons based on when I was here. I do agree that players normally peak at 26 or 27 though, but wouldn't doing that kind of mess with the talent levels we already have?